Gulf Coast Tribune

Website Under Construction While Being Updated

 


Website Links Under Construction While Being Updated 2020

Archive Evidence Unfiltered Facts And More Guaranteed!





It Got Worse! The Clerks Covered Up Fraud Upon The Court And More Guaranteed!


The Evidence Proved The Judge In Atlanta Court Of Appeals Didn't Dismiss The Case On A Void Judgement, It Was The Clerks That Covered Up The Constitutional Issues, Fraud Upon The Court, A Void Judgement and More Using Deceptive Practices With The Law Firms Linked To This Complaint and Alabama!



The Judge Didn't Sign The Orders By The Rule Of Law Because The Clerks Linked To The Law Firms Dismissed The Case To Cover Up What They Had Done and More, With The Alabama Law Firms and Alabama Judges That Initially Committed This Hate Crime, White Collar Crime Robbery and More Willfully!  The Clerks Knew Corla Jackson Timely Filed and More. The Clerks Help Defrauded The Supreme Court Because They Prepared The Files Using Deceptive Practices Guaranteed...









THIS VIOLATED FRAP 42.1(b)

CLERK NEVER ISSUED A NOTICE TO (PRO SE APPELLANT) UPON EXPERATION OF 14 DAYS FROM DATE IN THE ORDER ISSUED ABOVE MARCH 29, 2018, THE APPEAL WILL BE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. SEE: FRAP 42.1(b).



THIS EVIDENCE PROVE SOMEONE COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT KNOWING CORLA JACKSON HAD BUSTED SOMEONE THAT HAD COMMITTED FRAUD UPON FEDERAL COURTS AND MORE.  ILLEGALLY DISMISSING CORLA JACKSON APPEAL WAS ALREADY BASED UPON FRAUD UPON THE COURT AND DISMISSING A TIMELY FILED APPEAL IS MORE FRAUD UPON THE COURT, WHICH IS CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, QUESTIONS AND MORE. 


THE CLEARK KNEW ALL ALONE THAT CORLA JACKSON HAD FILED AN TIMELY BREIF, APPENDIX AND AN ADDITIONAL EXTENSION OF TIME IF NEEDED.  CORLA JACKSON HAD ALREADY WON HER CASE, BECAUE SHE FILED A (NON-FRIVOLOUS) COMPLAINT. THE CLERKS ORDER DIDN'T STATE  ANYTHING ABOUT BEING DISMISSED FOR (FAILURE TO PROSECUTE) OR BEING (DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION).


I CAN TELL YOU WHAT THEY DID, THEY REPLACED THE (CLERKS NOTICE DATED MARCH 29, 2018) WITH A JUDGES ORDER AND COMMTTED FRAUD UPON THE COURT USING DECEPTIVE PRACTICES WITHOUT NOTIFYING CORLA JACKSON OR THE JUDGES THAT ISSUED THE ORIGINAL ORDER (JUDGE FRANK HULL), WHO WAS OVER THIS (NON-FRIVOLOUS) COMPLAINT-CASE. WHY WOULD THEY GO AROUND (JUDGE FRANK HULL), WHO WAS OVER THIS (NON-FRIVOLOUS) COMPLAINT-CASE.


SERVICE OF PROCESS AND DUE PROCESS IS MANDITORY, EXPECIALLY ON A TIMELY FILED APPEAL-COMPLAINT-VOID JUDGEMENT, SET ASIDE A (NON FRIVOLOUS) COMPLAINT FILED BY CORLA JACKSON).


THERE'S A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FILING A BREIF OR APPENDIX VS. CORRECTING A BRIEF OR APPENDIX DEFICIENCY)! YOU CANNOT HAVE A DEFICIENCY UNTIL AFTER THE BRIEF OR APPENDIX IS FILED AND EXAMINED, PUTTING IN WRITING THE DEFICIENCY'S THAT MUST BE CORRECTED BY A PARTICULAR TIME.  THE MORE THEY LIE, THE WORSE IT GET GUARANTEED!




THE MORE THEY LIE, THE WORSE IT GET GUARANTEED!  READ MORE





CONTINUE







CDC Halt Evictions Covid-19 Pandemic H.R.7301 Emergency Housing Protection CDC and Relief Act of 2020



All Rights Reserved Corla Reeves Jackson